Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts.
Memory & Cognition,
10(1), 82–93.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197629
Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27, pp. 76–121). San Diego: Academic Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
18(5-6), 513–562.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000026
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating Abstract Concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 129–163). Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., & Doris, J. M. (2013). Morality in high definition:
Emotion differentiation calibrates the influence of incidental disgust on moral judgments.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
49(4), 719–725.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.014
Christensen, J. F., Flexas, A., Calabrese, M., Gut, N. K., & Gomila, A. (2014). Moral judgment reloaded: A moral dilemma validation study.
Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607
Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making:
A principled review.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
36(4), 1249–1264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008
Cipolletti, H., McFarlane, S., & Weissglass, C. (2016). The
Moral Foreign-Language Effect.
Philosophical Psychology,
29(1), 23–40.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.993063
Colbeck, K. L., & Bowers, J. S. (2012). Blinded by taboo words in
L1 but not
L2.
Emotion,
12(2), 217–222.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026387
Crockett, M. J. (2013). Models of morality.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
17(8), 363–366.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.005
Cushman, F. A. (2013). Action,
Outcome, and
Value A Dual-System Framework for
Morality.
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
17(3), 273–292.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313495594
De Neys, W., & Białek, M. (2017). Dual processes and conflict during moral and logical reasoning: A case for utilitarian intuitions? In J.-F. Bonnefon & B. Trémolière (Eds.), Moral inferences. (pp. 123–136). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). The costs of being consequentialist:
Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
79, 200–216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.004
Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
145(6), 772–787.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000165
Gamez-Djokic, M., & Molden, D. (2016). Beyond
Affective Influences on
Deontological Moral Judgment:
The Role of
Motivations for
Prevention in the
Moral Condemnation of
Harm.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
42(11), 1522–1537.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665094
Gray, K. J., & Keeney, J. E. (2015). Impure or
Just Weird?
Scenario Sampling Bias Raises Questions About the
Foundation of
Morality.
Social Psychological and Personality Science,
6(8), 859–868.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615592241
Gray, K. J., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition:
Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
143(4), 1600–1615.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036149
Gray, K. J., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind
Perception Is the
Essence of
Morality.
Psychological Inquiry,
23(2), 101–124.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
Greene, J. D. (2008). The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul. In Moral Psychology Volume 3: The neurosciences of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 35–79). Cambridge (Mass.): the MIT press.
Greene, J. D. (2016). Why cognitive (neuro) science matters for ethics. In S. M. Liao (Ed.), Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality (pp. 119–149). Oxford University Press.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An
fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.
Science (New York, N.Y.),
293(5537), 2105–2108.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
Gubbins, E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2014). Dual processes of emotion and reason in judgments about moral dilemmas.
Thinking & Reasoning,
20(2), 245–268.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.877400
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail:
A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Psychological Review,
108(4), 814–834.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Haidt, J., & Björklund, F. (2008). Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology Volume 2, The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). London: MIT.
Haidt, J., Björklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Virginia.
Harris, C. L., Ayçiçeĝi, A., & Gleason, J. B. (2003). Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language.
Applied Psycholinguistics,
24(4), 561–579.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000286
Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. (1985).
Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
11(1), 59–69.
Jacobson, D. (2012). Moral Dumbfounding and Moral Stupefaction. In Oxford studies in normative ethics (Vol. 2, p. 289).
Körner, A., & Volk, S. (2014). Concrete and abstract ways to deontology:
Cognitive capacity moderates construal level effects on moral judgments.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
55, 139–145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.002
McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories:
Well defined or fuzzy sets?
Memory & Cognition,
6(4), 462–472.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197480
McHugh, C., Griffin, S. M., McGrath, M. J., Rhee, J. J., Maher, P. J., McCashin, D., & Roth, J. (2023). Moral
Identity Predicts Adherence to
COVID-19 Mitigation Procedures Depending on
Political Ideology:
A Comparison Between the
USA and
New Zealand.
Political Psychology,
44(2), 337–360.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12838
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2017). Searching for
Dumbfounding.
Open Science Framework.
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WM6VC
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2020). Reasons or rationalizations:
The role of principles in the moral dumbfounding paradigm.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,
33(3), 376–392.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2167
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2023). Cognitive
Load Can Reduce Reason-Giving in a
Moral Dumbfounding Task.
Collabra: Psychology,
9(1), 73818.
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.73818
McHugh, C., Zhang, R., Karnatak, T., Lamba, N., & Khokhlova, O. (2023). Just wrong?
Or just
WEIRD?
Investigating the prevalence of moral dumbfounding in non-
Western samples.
Memory & Cognition.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01386-z
McPhetres, J., Conway, P., Hughes, J. S., & Zuckerman, M. (2018). Reflecting on
God’s will:
Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples’ deontological dilemma responses.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
79, 301–314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.013
Mikhail, J. (2000). Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy: A Study of the ’Generative Grammar’ Model of Moral Theory Described by John Rawls in ’A Theory of Justice.’ (Phd Dissertation, Cornell University, 2000) ({{SSRN Scholarly Paper}}). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
Oden, G. C. (1977). Fuzziness in semantic memory:
Choosing exemplars of subjective categories.
Memory & Cognition,
5(2), 198–204.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197362
Petrinovich, L., & O’Neill, P. (1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions.
Ethology and Sociobiology,
17(3), 145–171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6
Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2003). The intelligence of the moral intuitions:
A comment on
Haidt (2001).
Psychological Review,
110(1), 193–196.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.193
Prinz, J. J. (2005). Passionate Thoughts: The Emotional Embodiment of Moral Concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 93–114). Cambridge University Press.
Railton, P. (2017). Moral
Learning:
Conceptual foundations and normative relevance.
Cognition,
167, 172–190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.015
Reynolds, C. J., & Conway, P. (2018). Not just bad actions:
Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
Emotion,
18(7), 1009–1023.
https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000413
Royzman, E. B., & Borislow, S. H. (2022). The puzzle of wrongless harms:
Some potential concerns for dyadic morality and related accounts.
Cognition,
220, 104980.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104980
Royzman, E. B., Kim, K., & Leeman, R. F. (2015). The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 296–313.
Schein, C., & Gray, K. J. (2018). The
Theory of
Dyadic Morality:
Reinventing Moral Judgment by
Redefining Harm.
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
22(1), 32–70.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288
Sneddon, A. (2007). A
Social Model of
Moral Dumbfounding:
Implications for
Studying Moral Reasoning and
Moral Judgment.
Philosophical Psychology,
20(6), 731–748.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080701694110
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of
Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment.
Psychological Science,
17(6), 476–477.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x
Wiegmann, A., Okan, Y., & Nagel, J. (2012). Order effects in moral judgment.
Philosophical Psychology,
25(6), 813–836.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.631995